A US court blocked the Trump administration's effort to deport eight men to South Sudan after concerns about due process and human rights were raised.
A federal court intervened to halt the Trump administration's controversial attempt to deport eight men to South Sudan. The decision follows concerns regarding due process and international human rights standards.
The individuals in question were initially targeted for deportation to their countries of origin, including Myanmar, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, Mexico, and South Sudan. However, upon refusal by their respective home countries, authorities arranged for their removal to South Sudan, a nation under a US State Department travel advisory due to ongoing instability.
The deportation was challenged in court, resulting in a ruling by Judge Brian Murphy of the US District Court in Boston. Judge Murphy determined that the administration had violated a previous judicial directive issued in April, which guaranteed individuals being deported to third-party countries the right to legally challenge such actions.
"The brief window allowed for the men to object to their transfer was clearly inadequate," Judge Murphy stated.
The eight men are currently being held in Djibouti under the custody of the Department of Homeland Security. They will remain there for two weeks, as confirmed by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.
The court order stipulates that the men must receive adequate notice and a minimum of 15 days to contest their deportation, in accordance with international human rights standards. Additionally, six of the individuals have the right to assert fears of torture or mistreatment in the destination country, with legal representation.