Donald Trump lashed out at Democratic veterans who advised troops on declining unlawful orders, branding it "seditious behavior" amid controversial US boat stri
A heated political controversy has erupted in the United States after former President Donald Trump fiercely condemned a video released by six Democratic members of Congress, all military or intelligence veterans. The video advised U.S. troops on their right to refuse unlawful orders, prompting Trump to label their actions as "seditious behavior" and suggest severe penalties.
The Democratic lawmakers featured in the video — Senators Mark Kelly of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, along with Representatives Jason Crow of Colorado, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chris Deluzio, and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania — collectively warned service members about their legal obligation to decline illegal commands. "Our laws are clear: You can refuse illegal orders," stated Senator Kelly, a former U.S. Navy captain. Senator Slotkin reinforced this, urging troops to "stand up for our laws, our Constitution. Don't give up the ship."
While the video did not specify particular orders, its release coincides with a series of contentious U.S. military strikes on boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific. The administration alleges these vessels are involved in drug trafficking, but these operations have resulted in at least 88 fatalities since September 2. Relatives of the deceased dispute the characterization of their loved ones as traffickers, with Colombian President Gustavo Petro alleging one victim was a fisherman. The Department of Justice reportedly opined that those involved in the strikes cannot be prosecuted, though military statutes of limitation can extend for years, or indefinitely for capital crimes.
The video swiftly drew Republican ire, culminating in a strong reaction from Donald Trump on social media. In a series of posts, he escalated his criticism, calling it "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!" and branding the lawmakers "TRAITORS!!! LOCK THEM UP???" White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, when pressed, denied Trump intended a literal death threat, asserting that all orders issued by the commander-in-chief are lawful and that defying them could jeopardize national security. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former Air Force Judge Advocate General (JAG), also expressed his "disturbed" reaction, demanding the Democrats specify which orders they deem unlawful, stating he found "not a single example of an illegal order during this administration."
The U.S. boat strikes have also drawn international condemnation. The UN human rights chief has called for an investigation, describing the strikes as "unacceptable," and France's foreign minister stated they violate international law. Canada initially remained silent but later stated it was within the U.S. authorities' purview to make determinations. The Trump administration, with Pete Hegseth as defense secretary, has framed the operations as a "non-international armed conflict," labeling individuals on alleged drug boats as "enemy combatants." They cite drug gangs operating under Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and an alarming number of U.S. drug toxicity deaths. However, experts note that fentanyl, the primary cause of these deaths, predominantly enters the U.S. via the Mexico border, not Venezuela.
The debate over unlawful orders carries significant historical weight in the U.S. military. The most infamous case is that of William Laws Calley Jr., who led soldiers in the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War. Calley, who died last year, was convicted for the deaths of Vietnamese civilians but had his sentence commuted by President Richard Nixon. He later expressed remorse, citing his mistake was following orders. More recently, the Trump administration intervened in cases of soldiers accused of war crimes, with former Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth revealing Trump's order to maintain Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher's status after his conviction for battlefield misconduct.
Despite concerns from some Republicans about the administration's transparency regarding the strikes, Senate Democrats have struggled to garner sufficient support to limit Trump's authority without congressional approval. The ongoing dispute highlights deep divisions over military conduct, presidential power, and the interpretation of legal and ethical obligations within the armed forces.