Appeals Court Allows Trump to Keep National Guard in Washington, DC, Pausing Withdrawal Order Amid Anti-Crime Initiative

Dec 5, 2025 United States United States US Politics & Law
Appeals Court Allows Trump to Keep National Guard in Washington, DC, Pausing Withdrawal Order Amid Anti-Crime Initiative

A US appeals court temporarily halted an order forcing the Trump administration to withdraw the National Guard from Washington, DC. This decision allows troops

Appeals Court Temporarily Allows National Guard to Remain in Washington, D.C.

A federal appeals court has granted the Trump administration a temporary reprieve, allowing the National Guard to remain deployed in Washington, D.C., for the foreseeable future. This decision, issued by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on Thursday, effectively paused a lower court’s order that mandated the withdrawal of these federal troops.

Context of the Legal Challenge

District Judge Jia Cobb had previously ruled in November, requiring the Trump administration to remove the Guard by December 11, a deadline later extended by 21 days. The appeals court's recent ruling, however, explicitly stated that its stay "should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits" of the case. This indicates that it is a procedural pause, not a final judgment on the legality of the deployment itself.

President Trump has positioned the presence of roughly 2,000 National Guard members in the nation’s capital as a crucial component of an "anti-crime and beautification initiative." These reservists, unlike full-time soldiers, are typically deployed under specific conditions. The administration has faced similar legal hurdles in its attempts to deploy the Guard in other Democrat-led cities, including Los Angeles, California; Portland, Oregon; and Chicago, Illinois. However, the legal process in D.C., a federal territory where the president holds greater inherent authority, has progressed more slowly.

Judge Cobb’s November ruling had concluded that the Trump administration’s actions were "contrary to law" because it deployed the National Guard for "non-military, crime-deterrence missions in the absence of a request from the city’s civil authorities."

Recent Tragic Incident Spurs Further Discussion

The appeals court's decision comes amidst heightened scrutiny, particularly following a tragic incident just days prior. Two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot while on duty mere blocks from the White House. Sarah Beckstrom, 20, tragically succumbed to her injuries, while Andrew Wolfe, 24, remains in critical condition. Authorities have since charged 29-year-old Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal in connection with the attack. In response to this violence, the Trump administration pledged to augment the National Guard presence in the city by an additional 500 members.

This ongoing legal battle highlights the complex interplay between presidential authority, federal deployment of military assets, and local governance, especially within the unique jurisdiction of Washington, D.C.

By news 10 hours ago